Reginald Said:

Could nonsense like this occur in a computerization project ?

We Answered:

No. Nonsense like that is still confined to computerization questions.

Rebecca Said:

I need some one to do this assighnment if it does not get done bye 12:00pm im going to be toast? Please 10 poi?

We Answered:

This seems like a project that you would have been given weeks to work on, and with a partner. You will not learn anything by having the internet do it. Good luck!

Jeanne Said:

What's the general opinion on this beginning?

We Answered:

Your excerpt is too short for anyone to be able to comment on the plot so I'm guessing you want critique on your writing. It's not bad at all, but it does need work. Your first paragraph has so much purple prose that I almost quit reading (although I'm glad I continued). Thin out the adjectives a bit and you'll be fine. Your dialogue is believable for the most part, and then I ready cacophony - I don't know anyone under the age of 21 who would use that word, in the real world or in a fantasy scenario. It's just too outlandish and improbable. I loved your character's names - unique but not so crazy that they can't be pronounced. All in all, I enjoyed reading it and I really think you just need some editing. Well done!

Stacey Said:

Anyone good at grammer and won't mind doing a grammer check for me?

We Answered:

I think overall I was very happy about how the set induction and HOW my lesson turned out. The children had a great time and have been asking me to come back. Their teacher reported back to me that they have been using the word textureS and patternS correctly and applied it to the art work they were looking at in class. Many of the children have been questioning the idea of art, what makes you famous and how can they get into an art museum. Most of my set backS and struggles were due to the fact I was unfamiliar with the students and the classroom. The teacher forgot to tell me that she has interruptions due to music lessons where another teacher pulled students out of the classroom one at a time. So that took me a little off guard and I had to pause and help the student back into the classroom. I had one student come in during the set induction and one student leave that came back later while doing the project. The teacher commented this was a common problem in her classroom.
After viewing the video tape a watching my set induction, I notice that I should have had a better system of handing out paper. It was very time consuming to have the children pick the color of paper they wanted and to hand theM all out. To be more efficient with time, I should have just mixed the paper and passed it out randomly because it would have accomplished the same results. It was also very hard for me to gage how fast the student could work, some of them haD masteD cutting but otherS took little more time. I also planned for the children to do three WHAT? but I wasn’t if the throwing the paper was to exciting or if doing three steps was too hard for them WHAT?. The teacher advised later that both things were true, they were still struggling on doing three steps. Being full of sugar and the high excitement level didn’t help. I felt I did a good job just shifting the task and braking into two parts when they started to get over excited.
Over all the lesson was good and it was fun for the students. It was hard to plan a set induction blind without knowing the children. My set induction was suppose to take fifteen minutes but it took little longer because I didn’t know to account for certain things like paper taking so long or the children getting frustrated with mistakes and even clean up time when one of the little boys thought it might be interesting to glue his hands together when no one was looking. The children seem to be very engaged and enjoyed making guesses and random comments about the art. I can’t wait for the second micro teach because now I have some structure to base my next lesson on. I also know that I need to have more of a formal system of a graphic organizer to keep the students with different learning style to keep the students interested and motivate.

Erik Said:

Just HOW indebted are dems to repubs?

We Answered:

Sorry. I stopped at the second paragraph due to the gross inaccuracy of this statement:

"His medications work because money-grubbing Republicans refuse to place price controls on drugs, thereby allowing pharmaceutical companies to earn enough money to pay for the extensive R&D and take the risks necessary to create miracle drugs."

If this is how poorly argued and factually inaccurate the rest is, I'll save myself the nuisance of reading further.
The majority of research into pharmaceuticals is financed by the United States government via NIH and NSF grants and corporate subsidies. Drug companies pick up the research when it's essentially finished by purchasing the patents and putting the drugs through trials (where another large portion of the bill is federally subsidized). After that, the overpriced drug hits the American market and the company makes millions.


Get a clue.