Margie Said:

Is it ok to teach the kids about war, cause and effect yet do nothing about present state of war/s?

We Answered:

kids love wars

Hazel Said:

Would this be cause and effect?

We Answered:

You would be able to demonstrate cause and effect if you were able to show that you had no previous love of children until after you took the class. It's hard to prove a negative, but it could be done. It would be easier to establish the cause and effect of the second experience because obviously you had no experience teaching children until after the internship.

Lillian Said:

How would I write a cause or effect essay about Teaching Abroad?

We Answered:

Cause and effect essays are pretty easy to write. You basically have to write why things or any particular event happens (or happened) and what are the effects of it (or what were the effects of it). You need to make sure that both parts of the essay are distinguishable.

Regards,
http://www.perfecttermpapers.com

Viola Said:

What's a fun way to teach cause and effect to students?

We Answered:

break something,get a useless vase,glass shattering sounds should etch in their minds forever
carefull with teh glass though

Debra Said:

teaching cause and effect to a sixth grader?

We Answered:

I'm not quite sure how you would explain the difference between the two (it's a tough one) but an 11 yr old should be able to understand the theory well enough?

As an activity you play dominoes. You can show that an effect can also be a cause.

Hope that helps and wasn't too silly of an idea!

Kevin Said:

Did David Hume deny cause and effect in the a priori mode, a posteri mode or all togeather?

We Answered:

That seems about right, but using these terms to talk about David Hume's philosophy seems a bit artificial to me; He wasn't nearly as obsessed with categorical exactitude as Kant was.
What David Hume says is that a cause can never be observed. All we observe is the effect of a cause. The example of billiard balls is used. You observe contact between the balls, and you observe movement of the second ball. But you never observe the first ball causing the second ball to move. You would deduct that the second ball has moved and in this way come up with a consistent universe.
I think Hume was more concerned with dispelling Aristotelian causes in his skepticism, but he wanted to keep the possibility of science, and therefore deduction, alive.
So a priori, you never observe a cause.
You do observe that event a consistently leads to event b, and therefore, you deduct event a leads to event b consistently. So a posteriori, you have a cause.

Sonia Said:

Reconize cause and effect by discussing how lack of oxygen is related to lack of energy?

We Answered:

Well, if your body lacks O2, then your blood cells arn't able to get the energy that they need to preform tasks. If you were to play a sport where you are running like crazy and your body lacks oxygen, then you could die.